Mom taken to court over vaccine fears that are all too real
Yet another Michigan mom has been hauled into court over her refusal to vaccinate her child.
Lori Matheson told a judge that she “started reading literature on vaccinations,” and what she learned not only violated her religious beliefs, but it was enough for her to make up her mind — she would not be allowing her 2-year-old daughter to get these shots.
The reason why is that some contain a shocking ingredient — one that we first told you about several years ago.
And it’s just as disturbing today as it was the first time we broke the news.
But that might just be a blessing in disguise for other moms, dads, and grandparents who learn why Lori said “no.”
A number of vaccines — including those for chicken pox, rubella (including the MMR combo), and hepatitis A — are made with components of cells from two babies aborted in the 1960s.
And even if you carefully read all the ingredients, you won’t see that spelled out — at least not in so many words.
That’s because it’s listed in scientific code. One goes by the name MRC-5… and the other, WI-38.
The first code name is the designation given to cells that originated from a healthy 14-week-old male fetus aborted in 1966, the second was a 16-week-old female fetus who was aborted in 1961.
Now, don’t expect to find that little detail mentioned on any forms, waivers, or permission slips given to parents to sign — because it isn’t there.
So, obviously, Lori Matheson did her homework.
But as usual, whenever someone objects to vaccines, there’re made out to be some kind of hysterical anti-vaxxer who just doesn’t know the facts.
And that’s what experts are trying to do with Lori. Local pediatrician Dr. Daniel Schnaar said, “If I had to testify, I would say that vaccines are not made from aborted fetuses.”
Well, Dr. Schnaar, if you did, you’d be giving false information. And it’s time for those who criticize and mock well-informed and caring parents to learn the facts and tell the truth.
But aside from the moral implications in shooting a chemical into tots that’s both made in and contains the DNA and protein of another human being… is it even safe?
And unfortunately, the answer to that is no.
Dr. Theresa Deisher, a well-respected genetic engineer who holds a PhD in molecular and cellular physiology from Stanford, broke the news several years ago how vaccines that contain WI-38 (from the baby girl aborted in Sweden) may be what is behind many childhood cancers.
As Dr. Deisher revealed, her cell line was “contaminated” with a retrovirus that can be “reactivated” and is known to be associated with lymphomas in children.
And not only are those cells associated with cancer, she went on to tell, but autism, too. In fact, autism rates surged every time another vaccine made using fetal cell lines was added to the lineup.
As this issue goes on — in schools, doctor’s offices, and now courtrooms — you’ll no doubt hear how these cells are “purified” out of the final shots or that the whole thing is just an Internet rumor.
But, as you now know, that’s just not true!
Even the trade association for Big Pharma was forced to retract an earlier statement that was fed to reporters all over the country about how no fetal cells remain in vaccines.
And kids aren’t the only ones at risk. One vaccine that’s being pushed on seniors, the Zostavax shingles shot, also contains fetal cells!
So, next time your doctor asks why you’ve turned that shot down, just tell him that that it contains MRC-5, and you know exactly what that is.
“Oakland County mom in court battle over not vaccinating her child” Charlie Langton, October 9, 2017, Fox 2, fox2detroit.com
