Calif. vaccine law goes into effect, barring some kids from school

California bars school doors to kids who aren’t fully vaccinated

As the school year begins in California, kids as young as five years old are being booted out of their classrooms and sent home.

And it’s all because of one of the craziest vaccine laws ever passed in America.

Since last year I’ve been telling you about SB 277, and how it would kick kids out of school if they don’t get every single vaccine the CDC recommends.

And that includes some of the most dangerous vaccines around.

Now that kids are being denied an education, parents across the state are up in arms and are wondering why they can’t decide what’s best for their children.

And a major lawsuit is trying to get SB 277 off the books before any more kids are harmed.

The state vs. the Constitution

Back to school should mean things like new clothes, backpacks and notebooks.

But if you live in California, it’s a whole other story. Especially if your child is entering kindergarten or the seventh grade.

SB 277 applies to every single child in California — and it doesn’t matter whether those kids are in private school, public school or even daycare.

And any vaccine objections parents or grandparents may have based on personal belief or religious grounds have been done away with.

The law is so nuts that it requires five-year-olds to get three doses of hepatitis B vaccine (which is for a sexually transmitted disease), four doses of the pneumonia shot and two of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella).

For kids entering seventh grade — the other time the vaccine police will be standing at the schoolroom door — it’s time for a series of dangerous HPV shots, either Gardasil or Cervarix.

As I told you in July, a group of lawyers around the U.S. are trying to stop the law from taking effect, saying that it flies in the face of the Constitution and that the right to an education is guaranteed for all children in America.

And last Friday, that case went before U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, who listened to what 17 California families had to say.

A ruling is expected in the next couple weeks, which isn’t soon enough for lots of California families.

Outside of the courthouse, dozens of parents along with their children joined together for a demonstration. And one of the plaintiffs in the case, Tanya Sutton, told reporters that even though her son has an exemption from a doctor (the only exception SB 277 allows), she still can’t get him into kindergarten.

“I’m a single parent and I can’t home school my child,” she said.

One of the attorneys representing the parents in this case hit the nail on the head when she said that the state is taking the government’s “duty” to provide a “free and equal education” to all children and now making it the parents’ responsibility.

She also commented on how the law treats these kids “as if they’re diseased children” who need to be kept apart from others.

As I told you when SB 277 first came out, it was organized and put into action by a Big Pharma puppet by the name of Senator Richard Pan — the top recipient of drug-industry payments to the California Legislature the year before the law was introduced.

And despite what California officials will tell you, the highly charged topic of vaccination isn’t nearly as clear-cut simple as all these pro-pharma politicians would like you to believe.

It’s not just about measles, mumps or hepatitis. No, it’s about money and power — and about vaccines with dangerous ingredients that have caused serious, life-threatening effects in children that have been documented by the government’s own vaccine adverse-reaction reports.

And it’s about who decides if those are acceptable risks for a child — parents or government officials.

Sources:
“No immediate ruling in school vaccination case” Paul Sisson, August 12, 2016, The San Diego Union-Tribune, sandiegouniontribune.com