Attempt to make people less afraid of vaccines backfires, big-time
It looks like they might have to start calling Missouri the “Don’t show me state” — at least as far as vaccines are concerned.
For years I’ve been telling you that the more people know about the risks of vaccines, the less likely they are to agree to them.
But a group of University of Missouri researchers set out to prove me wrong.
They bet that they could educate people about all the side effects of vaccines, and they’d line up for the jabs anyway.
What happened may be the greatest backfire in research history. And it’s leading to some very dangerous recommendations that could put you and the people you love in harm’s way.
It’s bad enough that the mainstream regularly tries to force us into getting vaccines without breathing a word about the dangers.
And after this latest study, don’t expect that to get any better.
You see, researchers from the University of Missouri got a crazy idea in their heads. They figured that even if they took the time to inform patients about the potential risks and reactions of vaccines, those folks would still get the shots.
They thought it would build trust. Want to guess how that went?
For their study, researchers gave more than 1,000 people access to data from the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) on the HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.
That’s right — the same vaccines I’ve been warning you about for years that have left hundreds of kids in constant pain, paralyzed, and even dead.
And once people saw these horror stories in black and white, they weren’t rolling up their sleeves — they were running for the hills!
The patients in the study were actually significantly less likely to agree to vaccines after seeing the VAERS reports.
These researchers said they were sure that the VAERS data would “make participants feel more assured that vaccines are safe.” What they discovered, however, “was the opposite.”
No kidding. There’s a reason the mainstream has been trying to keep this information from us for years.
Now you’d think a study like this would be a wake-up call. You’d hope the mainstream would finally realize that we all take these vaccine risks a lot more seriously than they realized.
Yeah, not exactly.
Instead, the researchers concluded that the media needs to be careful about how it covers vaccine stories. Because the more we learn, the less likely we’ll be to get vaccines.
That’s right — they want to make sure you and everyone you know is kept in the dark even more than before. How do these people look themselves in the mirror?
The good news is that you don’t have to rely on the media or the mainstream for information on the dangers and side effects of vaccines.
You can access the VAERS website yourself right here.
Doing a little digging will help you make the best (and most informed) decision about which shots are right for you and the people you care about.
Sources:
“Reported data on vaccines may not build public trust or adherence” University of Missouri-Columbia, June 1, 2016, ScienceDaily, sciencedaily.com
