The under-over
I enjoy occasionally listening to National Public Radio, but sometimes I would swear the “P” in NPR stands for Pharmaceutical.
Monday morning, on my way in to work, I was listening to NPR when I heard a comment that nearly made me drive off the road. It wasn’t exactly road rage – nothing that extreme – more like road shock. I’m not certain, but there’s a good chance I shouted “I CAN’T BELIEVE MY EARS!” out loud.
Now there are all sorts of reasons why this wide disparity might exist. And I think the very fact that it DOES exist points up the arbitrary factors involved in diagnosing these so-called “disorders” of ADD (attention deficit disorder) and ADHD (attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder). But while addressing these regional differences in the data, NPR reporter Jackie Norton spoke the line that made me nearly leap through the sun-roof of my car: “The study doesn’t address if the stimulant drugs are being underused in one area, or overused in another.”
UNDERUSED! As if it’s even remotely possible to under-prescribe stimulant drugs for children! As if there are poor, unfortunate kids out there who are being deprived of their daily dose of Ritalin!
I know that the hectic pace of life that comes with raising kids makes the concept of dietary change much easier said than done. So believe me, I’m not passing any judgment on parents who opt for Ritalin, especially when they’re often pressured to take the pharmaceutical route by pediatricians, school administrators and fed-up teachers.
The point is this: There are options to Ritalin. And anytime someone suggests that stimulant drugs like Ritalin might be “underused,” they’ll hear my over-stimulated cry of disbelief all the way from Louisiana to Washington, D.C.
To Your Good Health,
Jenny Thompson
Health Sciences Institute
Sources:
Ritalin Study Report, Jackie Norton, NPR Morning Edition, 2/3/03
“Geographic Variation in the Prevalence of Stimulant Medication Use Among Children 5 to 14 Years Old: Results From a Commercially Insured US Sample” Pediatrics, Vol. 111 No. 2 February 2003, pp. 237-243


